Reasons why hanging was considered the most ignominious and defaming form of capital punishment in Medieval and Early Modern Europe
Reasons why hanging was considered the most ignominious and defaming form of capital punishment in Medieval and Early Modern Europe
The method of dropping someone a precise height to break their neck and kill them instantly (while
not decapitating them) is relatively new. Throughout most of history, hanging was a slow, painful death.
A beheading by a good executioner, on the other hand, was often a very quick and painless way to go. The
head would come off with one, clean swing of the sword/axe.
That said, a beheading by a good executioner is harder to come by than you might think. Especially in later periods when the executioners tended to be both older and less experienced, there are plenty of stories of beheadings that required over a dozen blows to sever the neck.
Beheading mishaps were so common, they make an entire section in *The Executioner Always Chops Twice: Ghastly Blunders on the Scaffold*.
For example, when Mary Queen of Scots was beheaded, the executioner first accidentally hit her in the back of the head with the axe.
It seems that, in general, using an axe was more likely to go awry than using the sword. Continue reading
Comments
Post a Comment